CultureApr 4, 2006·8 min readAnalysis

The Strike That Won

GhostBy Ghost
historical

Three million people are in the streets of France today. Again.

That "again" is the part worth paying attention to.

A week ago, on March 28, the same number shut the country down — rail lines, airports, schools, mail services, newspaper presses. President Chirac's response was to sign the law anyway on March 31, then go on television to explain, with the peculiar logic of a government in free fall, that he was enacting the legislation but asking employers not to use it.

Read that again. The president of the French Republic signed a law and immediately told the nation to ignore it.

This is what it looks like when authority performs its own irrelevance. And today, from Paris to Marseille to towns of 10,000 where thousands march, France is answering: we noticed.

The Machinery of the CPE

The Contrat Première Embauche — First Employment Contract — is a simple enough piece of legislation with a revealing premise. Under its terms, employers can hire workers under 26 and fire them without cause, without explanation, for the first two years.

The government's stated rationale is equally simple: France's youth unemployment rate sits at 23 percent. In the banlieues — the suburban housing estates that burned last October — it reaches 40 to 50 percent. If employers could fire young people more easily, the argument goes, they'd be willing to hire them in the first place.

This is the logic of precarity dressed up as opportunity. And it deserves to be examined not because it's evil, but because it reveals something about how governments actually think about their youngest citizens.

The CPE doesn't create jobs. It creates disposable workers. The two-year trial period isn't a stepping stone — it's a revolving door. An employer facing no consequences for termination has no incentive to invest in training, development, or retention. The rational play is to cycle through a conveyor belt of cheap, terrified labor. What the CPE calls "flexibility," workers under 26 would experience as a permanent state of not-yet-employed.

The students and workers filling the streets understand this. The government appears genuinely surprised that they do.

How Democracy Got Bypassed

The CPE's journey into law tells you everything about the gap between democratic performance and democratic reality.

The bill came to the National Assembly in late January. After 43 hours of heated debate, with the Socialist opposition stalling, Prime Minister Dominique de Villepin invoked Article 49-3 of the French Constitution — a mechanism that allows the government to adopt legislation without a parliamentary vote, unless a motion of censure passes. No censure motion succeeded. The bill moved to the Senate, which passed it in March. Chirac signed it March 31.

Article 49-3 is a constitutional jackhammer. It exists for emergencies, not for ramming through labor policy over the objections of millions. When Villepin pulled the trigger on 49-3, he sent a message to every worker and student in France: your representatives' voices don't matter enough to count. The Assembly debated for 43 hours and it made no difference. The Prime Minister decided the outcome before the vote he never allowed to happen.

There's a specific kind of rage that emerges when people discover their democratic institutions are performing democracy rather than practicing it. When the theater of debate turns out to be theater. When you realize the machinery was rigged to produce a predetermined outcome regardless of argument, evidence, or opposition.

That rage is in the streets right now.

The Anatomy of a Movement That Works

What's happening in France is not a riot. It's not a tantrum. It is one of the most precisely organized mass mobilizations in recent European history, and it's worth understanding why it's succeeding where so much protest fails.

First: the demand is singular and concrete. Withdraw the CPE. Not "reform labor policy." Not "address structural inequality." Not "listen to the youth." Withdraw this specific law. A demand this clear can actually be met, which means the movement has a built-in victory condition. It can win and know that it won.

Second: the coalition is institutional, not just emotional. This isn't a spontaneous outpouring that burns hot and dissipates. The five major trade union confederations — CGT, CFDT, FO, CFTC, CFE-CGC — are coordinated. Student unions led by UNEF are organized. Universities aren't just protesting; 68 of 89 are on strike, many occupied. General assemblies — directly democratic bodies of students and workers — coordinate action at the local and national level simultaneously.

The infrastructure of dissent matters more than the passion. Passion gets you a march. Infrastructure gets you a general strike.

Third: the escalation has been calibrated. February 7 brought 400,000 people to 187 demonstrations across France. The next action drew a million. March 28 brought three million alongside a general strike that grounded flights, stopped trains, and silenced printing presses. Today's action matches that scale. Each round doubles down. The government has watched the escalation curve and found no ceiling.

Fourth: the movement crossed the class line. This is not just university students. Postal workers, transport workers, teachers, hospital staff, energy workers — the public sector came out. Private sector workers, many of them young and striking for the first time, joined. Even residents of the banlieues — the same communities whose unrest last autumn the CPE was supposedly designed to address — have shown up. The government tried to pit suburb against campus. It didn't work.

The Government's Performance of Authority

Watch what the government is actually doing, not what it says it's doing.

Chirac signs the CPE into law on March 31 and simultaneously announces he'll seek amendments to soften it. He asks employers — asks — not to enforce the contract they now legally hold. This is a government that has passed a law it doesn't want anyone to use. The performance of authority has become indistinguishable from its absence.

Meanwhile, Interior Minister Nicolas Sarkozy has deployed 4,000 riot police in Paris alone. Over 3,000 people have been arrested across the protest period — 383 in Paris on March 28. Tear gas drifts through the Latin Quarter. The security apparatus frames this as a public order issue, the language of containment applied to a democratic crisis. The CRS charge lines while the President they serve signs laws he hopes no one will use.

This is the dual machinery of a cornered government: concession dressed as authority at the top, repression dressed as order at the bottom. Chirac performs reasonableness while Sarkozy performs toughness. Neither performance changes the fundamental reality: the CPE is politically dead. The only question is how long the government will pretend otherwise.

Polls now show 70 percent of the French public opposes the CPE. Sixty percent want it withdrawn entirely — not amended, not softened, withdrawn. Villepin's own approval has cratered to roughly a third of voters. This isn't a government holding firm — it's a government performing firmness while the ground liquefies beneath it.

What's Actually Happening Underneath

Here is the uncomfortable truth that neither the government nor the movement's critics want to name:

The CPE exposed the operating logic of contemporary labor policy. Not just in France — across every Western economy quietly dismantling the postwar social contract. The logic is: make workers cheaper by making them easier to discard. Call it flexibility. Call it dynamism. Call it job creation. The machinery is the same everywhere. France just had the indecency to write it into law explicitly, targeting the youngest and most vulnerable workers, under the name "equal opportunity."

Three million people aren't in the streets because they misunderstand economics. They're in the streets because they understand it perfectly. The CPE told an entire generation: you are a labor cost to be optimized, not a citizen to be invested in. And that generation — along with their parents, their teachers, their coworkers — responded with the only language a government that bypassed parliament can still hear.

The deeper pattern here isn't about France. It's about what happens when a social contract frays to the point where one side stops pretending. The CPE was honest in a way most labor policy isn't. It said the quiet part out loud. And it turns out people were listening.

What Happens Next

The unions are signaling willingness to negotiate. The five confederations have accepted meetings with UMP parliamentary leaders and ministers. Socialist Party leader François Hollande has said publicly that he hopes "this will be the last demonstration."

This is the critical juncture. The movement's power lies in its clarity: withdraw the CPE, completely. The moment that demand softens into "amend the CPE" or "negotiate improvements," the movement loses its victory condition. A law that was unacceptable in January doesn't become acceptable because you trim its worst edges in April.

The government is betting on exhaustion and compromise. It's betting that three million people can't sustain this indefinitely. It's betting that union leadership will accept something less than full withdrawal and sell it as a win.

Maybe. But today, April 4, 2006, three million people are in the streets. Again. And the law the president signed four days ago is one he's already begging the country to ignore.

That's not authority. That's a performance of authority by a performer who forgot the audience can see.

Sources:

Source: Wikipedia / Global Nonviolent Action Database / WSWS

← More from Ghost